Narratív Pszichológiai Kutatócsoport

StoryNet Workshop

KRE BTK Központi épület, Díszterem

1088 Budapest, Reviczky utca 4.

2014. június 27-28.

 

 

PROGRAM

 

Friday, 27th June

8:50-9:00 Barbara Maleckar, & Tibor Pólya: Welcome

 

9:00-10:00 Keynote: Janosz Laszlo: Narrative categorial content analysis

 

10:00-10:15 Coffee break

 

10:15-11:45 Social and historical context of narrative

10:15-10:45 Manuel Menke, & Susanne Kinnebrock: What are effects, actually? Reflecting the social and historical dimensions of narrative effects

10:45-11:15 Tibor Pólya, & Pál Kővágó: Group history narrative and social identity of the narrator

11:15-11:45 Boglárka Komlósi, & Lívia Ivaskó: Ironical speech as initiation to a social group

 

11:45-13:00 Lunch

 

13:00-14:00 Keynote: Johathan Cohen

 

14:00-15:30 Identification

14:00-14:30 Hans Hoeken, & Matthijs Kolthoff: Identification and narrative impact: The impact of perspective and character similarity

14:30-15:00 Nurit Tal Or, Jonathan Cohen, & Maya Mazor Tregerman: The tempering effect of transportation: Exploring the effects of transportation and identification during exposure to controversial two-sided narratives

15:00-15:30 Lettica Hustinx, & Anneke de Graaf: Sympathy for the devil?

 

15:30-15:45 Coffee break

 

15:45-17:15 Narrative effects

15:45-16:15 Kobie van Krieken, Hans Hoeken, & José Sanders: The social effects of journalistic crime narratives

16:15-16:45 Aleksandra Krogulska: The influence of narrative structure on the memory conformity effect

16:45-17:15 Constanze Schreiner, Markus Appel, Maj-Britt Isberner, & Tobias Richter: The role of narrativity, argument quality, and working memory in narrative persuasion

 

 

Saturday, 28th June

9:00-10:00 Keynote: Markus Appel

 

10:00-10:15 Coffee break

 

10:15-11:45 Narrative elements: Foregrounding and perspective

10:15-10:45 Moniek M. Kuijpers: Rereading and print exposure: mediators of absorption when reading a literary text

10:45-11:15 Katalin Bálint, & Frank Hakemulder: How foregrounding enters life: Improved self-understanding and deviating stylistic techniques

11:15-11:45 Elsi Kaiser: Text genre and perspective-taking: Implications for empathy

 

11:45-13:00 Lunch

 

13:00-14:00 Poster session

Aleksandra Gradowska: Effect of narrative interpretation of important challenges in life to the quality of life

Noora Kaikkonen: Association of creativity and mental disorders in crative writing process via neuroimaging techniques and self-perception

Pál Kővágó, & Tibor Pólya: Sharing emotion eliciting experiences online

Emy Koopman: The attraction of sad stories: Reader motivations and the relation to personality traits

Barbara Maleckar, & Annika Hamachers: This story has a point: Persuasion as a consequence of seeking the narrative meaning

Helena Bilandzic, Freya Sukalla, Nadine Mörz, & Silvia Beider: Does watching or creating a story makes a difference? The role of interactivity in videogames for moral thinking and reflection

 

14:00-15:30 Thinking about narratives

14:00-14:30 Freya Sukalla, Anne Bartsch, Barbara Maleckar, & Cornelia Schnell: Pause for thought and emotion: The effect of narrative pauses on viewers' empathy and social distance

14:30-15:00 Rick Busselle: The relations among thinking about (un)realism and emotional involvement in narratives

15:00-15:30 Lonneke van Leeuwen, Bas van den Putte, Reint Jan Renes, & Cees Leeuwis: Understanding the effects of Entertainment-Education narratives: The role of narrative engagement and audience members' narrative related thoughts

 

15:30-15:45 Coffee break

 

15:45-17:15 Effects of strategic narratives

15:45-16:15 Anneke de Graaf, Simon Zebregs, Bas van den Putte, & Peter Neijens: Using narratives in school-based substance use prevention for low-educated adolescents

16:15-16:45 Anja Kalch, & Tino Meitz: Argumentation strategies in campaigns for intimate partner violence prevention: Are narrative testimonies useful?

16:45-17:15 Anniek Boeijinga, Hans Hoeken, & José Sanders: The road to healthy lifestyle changes: Using narratives as a tool to bridge the intention-behavior gap

​